JUSTICE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPENSATION FOR LAND ACQUISITION BY PUBLIC APPRAISAL SERVICE OFFICE

Abstract

The Land Procurement Law only mentions what objects must be taken into account in carrying out an assessment of land, but does not explain in detail the procedure for determining the nominal value of the land. In addition, the Land Procurement Law states that the amount of compensation is determined from the results of the assessment from the appraisal team. The formulation of the problem in this study is how to resolve disputes in land acquisition assessed by KJPP without any comparison for land acquisition in the public interest? and how is the fairness of giving compensation for land acquisition which is assessed by the Public Appraisal Service Office (KJPP)? This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory and case approach. The source of legal materials in this study is secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials using library-based legal materials collection techniques. The analysis of legal materials used is systematic interpretation. The theory used in this research is the theory of dispute resolution according to Yahya Harahap and the theory of justice according to John Rawls. The results of the study indicate that the settlement of disputes in land acquisition assessed by KJPP without any comparison for land acquisition in the public interest, namely the party entitled as the owner of the object of land acquisition can file an objection to the local District Court whose jurisdiction covers the location of the object of the Land Procurement within the longest period of time. 14 (fourteen) working days after the deliberation on the determination of Compensation. In addition, an objection to the amount of compensation must be submitted to the two agencies, in this case the agency, namely the Regional Office of the National Land Agency and the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing of the Republic of Indonesia