A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF INDIAN CODES WITH OTHER COUNTRIES CODE

Authors

  • BHANU Department of Civil Engineering, ALFALAH University, Faridabad, India
  • MIRZA AAMIR BAIG Department of Civil Engineering (Assistant Professor), ALFALAH University, Faridabad, India

Keywords:

METHODOLOGY, AIM OF PROJECT

Abstract

Earthquakes are unpredictable and devastating. And the most unfortunate thing about earthquakes is that, they are not regular phenomena like the change of seasons in India. And perhaps that is why, we are mostly not prepared for them in advance. Earthquakes are low-probability events, but with high levels of risk to the society, it isimportant that the design of structures must be done in the best possible way to take into account these effects and thereby aiming for an adequate structural response. Parameters of different countriesseismic codes differ significantly due to which performance of the building also varies. Hence, it is necessary to do a comparative study so as to conclude which building will perform better. In this paper, we present the analysis and design of a G+12 building for seismic forces using four different countries seismic codes:-IS:1893-2002-Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Part 1, IS: 1893-2016-Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Euro code 8 -Design of structures for Earthquake resistance and ASCE7-10-Minimum Design loads for buildings and other structures. Building was analysed using Etabs 2016 then designed as per the specified codes.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-25

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 6 (2018): IJIERT

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED).

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  2. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
  3. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  4. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

 

Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. the right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
4. the right to self-archive the article.